Posts Tagged ‘Benyamin Netanyahu’

Israel-PA Direct Talks Begin This Week

August 30th, 2010 by Nathan Curby

Secretary Clinton briefs reporters on the Middle East Peace Process. She is joined by Special Envoy for Middle East Peace Talks Senator George Mitchell. (Photo: State Department/Michael Gross)

President Barack Obama will welcome Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to the White House Wednesday night for individual talks and a joint dinner before the start of direct talks between the two leaders on Thursday. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will host the negotiations, which she says the U.S. believes can lead to a peace agreement within a year.

The talks rest on a shaky basis. Israel’s partial settlement freeze in the West Bank is set to expire on September 26, and Abbas insists that he will abandon the negotiations if the freeze is not extended. Netanyahu, meanwhile, will not make any commitment to extending the freeze.

Abbas faces intense political pressure not to make concessions to Israel, and he is in a vulnerable position. His term as president is expired, and any agreements he makes will not be binding on Gaza, which is ruled by Hamas.

Hamas is reported to be planning “large-scale terrorist attacks” to disrupt the peace talks, according to Israeli and Palestinian Authority intelligence sources cited by DEBKAfile. Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal delivered a harsh speech last week condemning the talks and threatening not only Israel, but also Abbas, as well as Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Jordanian King Abdullah if they refused to boycott the negotiations.

Everyone involved, except for the Obama administration, has very low expectations for the talks, writes Shmuel Rosner in Slate:

The Americans say the time is right. The time may be right for the Obama administration, though it’s not clear why, but it is hardly right for the parties involved. Israel and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, think Iran is a more urgent priority. They believe the Palestinian problem can wait a little longer, and they see no Palestinian leaders they can make deals with. The Palestinian Authority and its president, Mahmoud Abbas, were dragged to these talks kicking and screaming, and they don’t seem to intend to give an inch. They think Netanyahu doesn’t really mean business, and they have a hard time dealing with criticism from Hamas, Syria, and other regional belligerents. “There’s clearly a trust deficit that we’re going to have to find a way to overcome,” presidential adviser and longtime special envoy Dennis Ross explained. The two leaders mistrust each other, but they also find it difficult to trust the American mediator, and the proposed pathway to peace, and the timing, and the achievability of the goals. They are the true masters of low expectations.

Nevertheless, the Obama administration remains hopeful for the outcome of the talks. The U.S. will present an outline at the talks aiming at an agreement within a year and implementation within ten years.

Netanyahu, Abdullah Discuss Israel-Jordan Ties

July 28th, 2010 by Nathan Curby

Pray for Jordan and other nations to earnestly seek peace with Israel. Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.

Israeli PM Benyamin Netanyahu with Jordan’s King Abdullah Tuesday in Amman. (Photo: GPO/Haaretz)

Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu met with Jordan’s King Abdullah on Tuesday, ending more than a year of near-silence between the two countries, Haaretz reports. U.S. President Barack Obama reportedly urged Abdullah to agree to the meeting in order to smooth over tensions between the nations.

Abdullah is skeptical about Netanyahu’s commitment to peace, but Netanyahu believes Abdullah is more convinced following their meeting. Netanyahu sees Jordan as the key to convincing the Palestinian Authority to enter direct talks with Israel. Netnayahu told Abdullah he is willing to “go far” to reach agreement with the Palestinians on core issues, provided that security arrangements are suitable.

U.S. Congress Backs Israel, More Flotillas to Gaza

June 22nd, 2010 by Nathan Curby

Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu will visit Washington on July 6 to speak with President Obama (Photo: Tomer Appelbaum/Haaretz)

Lebanon says it will retaliate against Israel should Israel use force against Lebanese ships attempting to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza, while Israel maintains that it will use “any means necessary” to prevent any ships from delivering cargo to Gaza. A Lebanese flotilla is set to sail to Cyprus, and then to Gaza to deliver aid.

Quartet envoy and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair urged anyone wanting to send aid to Gaza to use the legitimate land routes, saying Israel has a right to protect itself from rockets being delivered to Gaza. Israel last week relaxed its restrictions on humanitarian aid entering Gaza by way of land.

Meanwhile, Israel received large support from the U.S. Congress for its actions in raiding a Gaza-bound flotilla in late May. Eighty-five Senators and 298 Congressmen have signed a letter to the President expressing support for Israel, which says, “We fully support Israel’s right to self-defense.” The letter goes on to say that Israel did its best to make sure humanitarian supplies reached Gaza peacefully, but responded appropriately when Israeli commandos boarding one ship were “brutally attacked with iron rods, knives, and broken glass.” Nine activists were killed in the raid, and several Israeli commandos were seriously wounded.

Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu’s National Security Adviser, Uzi Arad, said Tuesday that the outlook is bleak for a U.S.-negotiated peace agreement. U.S. President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet with Netanyahu July 6 to discuss the peace process in Israel. The two were scheduled to meet June 1, but that meeting was postponed when the flotilla raid happened on May 31.

Gaza Flotilla Participants Invoked Killing of Jews

June 2nd, 2010 by Gary Bergel

Special report: Gaza aid ship had Al Qaeda mercenary crew.

Al-Jazeera aired the above video clips from a Gaza Flotilla rally in which participants chanted jihadist battle criies.

Click here to view clip of Gaza flotilla Islamic rally.

Click here to view clip of Israeli soldier’s testimony.

The Obama administration is refusing to condemn Israel for its interception of a convoy of ships purportedly carrying aid and peace activists to the Gaza Strip.  Facing reporters at the White House Tuesday, Mr. Obama’s spokesman Robert Gibbs said the United States agrees with the wording of a UN Security Council statement which said that “The Security Council deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries resulting from the use of force during the Israeli military operation in international waters against the convoy sailing to Gaza.”  The Council “condemned the acts” which lead to deaths and called for a full investigation.

Israeli intelligence revealed during a security cabinet meeting on Wednesday that most of those who attacked the Israeli boarding party on the Miva Marmara aid ship on Monday were Al Qaeda mercenaries.

Israeli officials said that a group of 40 of the more violent passengers were found to have no identification papers when they were arrested upon arrival in Israel.  Nearly all members of that particular group were equipped with bullet-proof vests, night-vision goggles and various light weapons. Each also carried the same exact amount of money as the others in his pockets.

Intelligence officials were able to determine, either through previous intelligence or through interrogation, that the 40-man group was either aligned with or was an active part of Osama bin Laden’s global terrorist network.  One of the organizations behind the so-called “aid” flotilla was the Turkish IHH, a movement that for years has supported anti-Western and anti-Israel terrorist organizations. At certain points in the past, the IHH has aided Al Qaeda.

The use of Turkish ships, the Al Qaeda connections, and the death of Turkish peace activists is straining both U.S. and Israeli relations with Turkey.  Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan blasted the raid as a “bloody massacre,” walked out on a meeting with Israel’s president and cozied up to nations hostile to Israel and the U.S. such as Syria and Iran.  Despite Islamic roots, Erdogan has been a pragmatist seeking to create a secular, modern state from the ashes of the Ottoman Empire.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his nation’s blockade of Gaza on Wednesday and said missiles would be smuggled into the Palestinian territory from Iran if the embargo is lifted.

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), the Defense Ministry (DM) and the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) have all given a clear and succinct summary of the situation:

“Israel was justified under international law in acting against the flotilla. A state of armed conflict exists between Israel and the Hamas regime that controls Gaza. Hamas has launched 10,000 rockets against Israeli civilians. At present, it is engaged in smuggling arms and military supplies into Gaza, by land and sea, in order to fortify its positions and continue its attacks.

Under international law, Israel has the right to protect the lives of its civilians from Hamas attacks. Consequently, it has undertaken measures to defend itself, including the imposition of a maritime blockade to curb Hamas rearmament. Israel cannot allow a sea-corridor to open to Gaza, a corridor which would allow weapons and terrorists to freely enter the Strip.”

Read Israel Today updates on this and other news in Israel.

Visit the Palestinian Media Watch to see and prayerfully review the anti-Israel, anti-Jewish propaganda routinely being presented to the Palestinian people in Gaza and their children.

Obama on Israel: “A Disagreement among Friends”

March 31st, 2010 by Gary Bergel

Barack Obama enjoyed a conciliatory interview Tuesday on the “Today” show with Matt Lauer.  He shared about getting an electronic devotional on his Blackberry each day and said he will “continue to reach out to the GOP.”  He declared that despite recent ill will over the issue of east Jerusalem, the U.S. and Israel remain firm allies. “I think the underlying relationship is solid as a rock. So my commitment, my personal commitment, to Israel’s security is unwavering, and I think that there is broad bipartisan consensus on that. This is a disagreement among friends about how to move forward,” he said. “I think Prime Minister Netanyahu intellectually understands that he has got to take some bold steps. I think politically he feels it. But it’s not just on the Israeli side. I’ve been very clear that the Palestinians have to take steps.”

Senior Israeli ministers have publicly rejected American demands for curbs on building in Jewish areas of east Jerusalem and other Palestinian pre-talk demands.  Benny Begin, a member of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s inner cabinet, said Monday on Israel Radio that the status of east Jerusalem should be resolved in direct negotiations with the Palestinians, not in advance. He said the American request “will definitely bring about the opposite of the declared goal. It will bring about a hardening in the policy of the Arabs and of the Palestinian Authority.” Avigdor Lieberman, the foreign minister and another member of the inner group of seven ministers, said in an interview: “I have not seen anyone among the seven who has consented to” a building freeze in most of the Jewish neighborhoods of Jerusalem.

Slowly, it is coming to light that President Obama made ten demands during his meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu last Tuesday.  Observers say these point to an intention to impose a permanent settlement on Israel and the Palestinians in less than two years.  Israeli officials view the demands that Obama made at the White House as the tip of the iceberg under which lies a dramatic change in U.S. policy toward Israel.

Of ten demands posed by Obama, four deal with Jerusalem: opening a Palestinian commercial interests office in east Jerusalem, an end to the razing of structures in Palestinian neighborhoods in the capital, stopping construction in Jewish neighborhoods in east Jerusalem, and not building in the neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo. The fact that the White House and State Department have been in contact with Israel’s European allies, first and foremost Germany, is seen as part of an effort to isolate and put enormous political pressure on Israel.

POLITICO reports that since Netanyahu’s tense visit to the White House last week, an intense debate inside the Obama administration has grown more heated.  Sources say within the inter-agency process, White House Middle East strategist Dennis Ross is staking out a position that Washington needs to be sensitive to Netanyahu’s domestic political constraints, while other officials including some aligned with Middle East peace envoy George Mitchell are arguing Washington needs to hold firm in pressing Benyamin Netanyahu for written commitments.

White House, Israel in Jerusalem Standoff

March 25th, 2010 by Gary Bergel

“The Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3,000 years ago and the Jewish people are building Jerusalem today… Jerusalem is not a settlement. It’s our capital.” (PM Netanyahu)

"I have set watchmen on your walls, O Jerusalem; they shall never hold their peace day or night. You who make mention of the Lord, do not keep silent, and give Him no rest till He establishes and till He makes Jerusalem a praise in the earth." (Psalm 62:6-7)

Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu arrived at the White House at 5:30 on Tuesday after a show of solidarity with leaders of Congress from both parties.  Netanyahu thanked the U.S. lawmakers for their “constant support” and “unflagging” friendship.  “Even though the challenges are immense, our will and our partnership is also immense,” Netanyahu said at an appearance with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH).

Netanyahu conferred privately with President Obama for nearly 90 minutes in the Oval Office.  A White House official said the president then went to his residence and Netanyahu remained at the White House to consult with his staff in the Roosevelt Room.  Netanyahu requested another meeting with Obama, who returned to the Oval Office to meet with Netanyahu from 8:20 p.m. to 8:55 p.m.  Netanyahu left the White House at 9:05 p.m. without speaking to reporters at a stakeout.

Netanyahu’s office issued a brief statement Wednesday morning, stating that after the meetings, the two leaders’ teams of advisers “continued to discuss the ideas that were raised.” Netanyahu was scheduled to hold an additional round of talks with special Mideast envoy George Mitchell later on Wednesday in Washington.  The two sides are in a stand-off over ongoing housing projects in Jerusalem. Plans to build 20 apartments near a Jewish-owned hotel in east Jerusalem were announced just hours before the leaders met.  There was no customary White House welcome and handshake for photographers.

White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said on Wednesday the White House continues to believe that Israeli building in Jerusalem is destructive to the Middle East “peace” process.

Netanyahu had outlined Jerusalem’s Jewish history during a moving speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Conference on Tuesday night — from before the time David had shepherded sheep in the hills of the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) to the present day.  “The Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3,000 years ago and the Jewish people are building Jerusalem today,” Netanyahu pointed out.   “Jerusalem is not a settlement. It’s our capital,” he declared.

Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat said in a London interview: “I don’t understand why the Americans are upset…. No government has ever frozen building in Jerusalem, not a Labor party government or Kadima. I think it would have been wise if the Americans had come and learned the details before they took a position.”

“There are detailed, public master plans for the good of all [the residents of Jerusalem]…. If the Americans had come and learned the plans, they wouldn’t have reacted as they did. To my regret, their policy was set according to what appeared in the Palestinian press,” Mayor Narkat maintained.

Members of Congress from both sides of the aisle have called on the Obama Administration to defuse tension between Washington and Jerusalem. See a list of Congressional statements. Rep. Gary Peters (D-MI) said, “I hope that the Administration will end its unnecessary denunciations of Israel and will instead turn its focus to working with Congress to finally enact strong sanctions on Iran.” Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) engaged in a colloquy with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) saying, “the American relationship with Israel is one of the strongest, most important, most steadfast bilateral alliances we have in the world because … it is based on shared values, shared strategic interests in the world, and, unfortunately, now on the fact that we in the United States and the Israelis are also targets of the Islamist extremists.”

Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the United States Military’s Central Command (CENTCOM) testified before the Senate a week ago and dropped a “bombshell,” accusing Israel of “intransience” In the Middle East.  Military observers are expressing a growing concern that Petraeus’ statement might indicate a shift in military ties and cooperation between the U.S. and Israel, the sharing of intelligence and operational assessments, as well as future joint exercises.

Star Parker’s editorial in IFA’s June, 2009 First Friday Prayer Letter outlines the overall shift in Obama policy toward Israel.

Major newspaper editorial boards and Middle East experts have called for the U.S. to defuse publicly escalating tensions with Israel, a critical U.S. ally in the region. “It has been startling — and a little puzzling — to see Mr. Obama deliberately plunge into another public brawl with the Jewish state,” The Washington Post wrote on Tuesday.  A day earlier, The Wall Street Journal questioned the administration’s strategy in Israeli-Palestinian talks. “If the Obama Administration opts to transform itself, as the Europeans have, into another set of lawyers for the Palestinians, it will find Israeli concessions increasingly hard to come by,” said the paper’s lead editorial.

Netanyahu’s Washington visit appeared designed in part to cement the Israeli perspective that Jerusalem is an indivisible city and that Jewish housing developments in neighborhoods such as Maale Adumim (see map on left) are strategically necessary to the transportation infrastructure and security of the city and nation — such as the traffic artery shown to the Dead Sea.

“Today, nearly a quarter of a million Jews, almost half the city’s Jewish population, live in neighborhoods that are just beyond the 1949 armistice lines,” Netanyahu said. “Everyone knows that these neighborhoods will be part of Israel in any peace settlement. Therefore, building in them in no way precludes the possibility of a two-state solution.”

On Monday, Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, publicly reframed the relationship between the two countries by breaking from the virtually unquestioning support of the previous administrations to say that the present one will “say so unequivocally” when it doesn’t agree with Israeli policy.

In an uncompromising AIPAC speech, in large part built around the position that Israel faces a perpetual threat of destruction, Netanyahu reminded the audience of the long history of persecution and barbarity against the Jewish people.

Comparing the size of Israel to that of New Jersey, he asked how we would feel with the Hezbollah terrorists on New Jersey’s northern border releasing 6,000 missiles, bringing in 50,000 more from Iran, and with Hamas on the southern border releasing 6,000 rockets and smuggling in more missiles, weapons and munitions through tunnels from Egypt.  He then pointedly noted that “the future of the Jewish state can never depend on the goodwill of even the greatest of men…. Israel must always reserve the right to defend itself.”

“While we cherish our homeland, we also recognize that Palestinians live there as well. We don’t want to govern them. We don’t want to rule them. We want them as neighbors, living in security, dignity and peace. Yet Israel is unjustly accused of not wanting peace with the Palestinians. Nothing could be further from the truth,” he said.  < listen to his speech here >

Read “Praying and Fasting for Jerusalem” by Derek Prince.